HealthCommentary

Exploring Human Potential

Miscarriage & Justices

Posted on | September 18, 2024 | 2 Comments

Mike Magee

“What did they know, and when did they know it?”

These are the questions Americans have become accustomed to asking of their leaders, dating back to Nixon and extending to Trump, and all Presidents in between. But now the same questions have surfaced, to the extreme discomfort of conservative Justices, as death and destruction of lives begins to mount in the wake of the Dobbs decision.

As predicted, graphic cases of young women bleeding out in parking lots after being refused life-saving acute care for miscarriage in 14 states across the nation are being documented and described. These stories are not only affecting the lives of couples across the land, but also threatening the “political lives” of downstream Republicans facing an upcoming election.

The responsible  Supreme Court Justices (Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett) and their legions of Ivy League clerks had scoured the literature far and wide before making the decision to eliminate women’s reproductive freedom in the U.S. and inflict lasting harm to their life-saving relationships with their local doctors.

Their review had to include Blue Cross & Blue Shield’s timely publication, “Trends in Pregnancy and Childbirth Complications in the U.S.” That report, surveying over 1000 pregnant women ages 18 to 44 in April, 2020, was, in part, designed to understand the impact the Covid epidemic had had on prenatal care nationwide. But what it revealed was that pregnancy complications were up 16% over prior years, in part due to “social barriers such as availability of appointments, lack of transportation or nearby providers.”

A comparison of 1.8 million pregnancies in 2014 versus 2018  demonstrated a severely compromised women’s health support system. 14% did not receive prenatal care in their first trimester, and 34% missed scheduled prenatal visits with 1 in 4 of these suffering complications in pregnancy. The BC/BS summary “underscores the importance of focusing on the health of pregnant women in America, especially as health conditions increase in this population…”

The Conservative Justices were forewarned.  Yet they still elected to throw fuel on a maternal health system which was already in flames. They were also aware of a 2021 study that confirmed that miscarriage was 43% more likely in Black women than in their white counterparts.

On May 2, 2022, Justice Alito and his allies engineered the release of a draft of a majority opinion in part to freeze attempts by Chief Justice Roberts to secure a compromise.  The leaked document  labeled Roe v. Wade “egregiously wrong from the start.”  As predicted, the ruling spawned chaos.  When 14 Red states established total bans on all abortions,  miscarrying women seeking help in ER’s literally had to fight for their lives. Their doctors were criminalized. Was this an abortion gone bad?

A miscarriage, or pregnancy loss before 20 completed weeks, is not an uncommon affair. Approximately 15% of pregnancies end in miscarriage, mainly the result of chromosomal or genetic abnormalities. That amounts to some 540,000 women in crisis, which most believe is under counted. 80% of miscarriages occur in the first 13 weeks of pregnancy.

25% of pregnant women experience some vaginal bleeding in the first trimester. For most (6 in 10) this is self-limiting and they go on to deliver a healthy baby. But for 4 in 10 (or 10% who present with bleeding) they go on to miscarry. All pregnant women who experience vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy need to have a medical examination. Doctors and midwifes check blood work, perform a physical examination, and do an ultrasound examination. 

Most pregnancy loss (95%+) occurs before 20 weeks gestation. If miscarriage occurs before 13 weeks, there is a good chance of clearing the blood clots and uterine tissue with medication and no surgical intervention. But if bleeding is severe, or the loss is occurring beyond 13 weeks, dilation and curettage (D&C) is both necessary and at times life saving. Under anesthesia, the cervix is dilated and any remaining pregnancy-related tissue is gently scraped and suctioned from inside the uterus. Patients are then closely monitored for several weeks for any evidence of continued bleeding or infection.

What did the Justices  know, and when did they know it?

  1. They knew that Miscarriages were a medical emergency and exceedingly common.
  2. They knew that 80% occur during the first trimester, and that existing state abortion laws on the books would restrict access to acute life-saving treatments in 14 states.
  3. They knew that pregnancy loss was far more common in non-whites and in rural underserved communities.
  4. They knew that the medical community opposed overturning Roe v. Wade in overwhelming majorities, and predicted maternal loss of life if the Justices proceeded.
  5. They read, two years after their deadly decision, the Commonwealth Report which stated , “The United States continues to have the highest rate of maternal deaths of any high-income nation, despite a decline since the COVID-19 pandemic. And within the U.S., the rate is by far the highest for Black women. Most of these deaths — over 80 percent — are likely preventable.”

They knew all this, and they did it anyway.

Comments

2 Responses to “Miscarriage & Justices”

  1. Lawrence Williams
    September 22nd, 2024 @ 1:09 am

    Hello again Mike.
    This insanity regarding women’s health strikes very close to me as the father of 3 daughters one of whom went through 2 years of IVF procedures, lost at least 2 implants and finally she and her husband now have a beautiful daughter who just celebrated her 2nd birthday. (I have yet to meet her, but that is another story all together.)
    Anyhow, my old lawyer’s brain has been kicking these court rulings and various legislative bans on abortion around for a while. And a thought has occurred to me that it MIGHT be that a change of wording might help women and their doctors get back to being able to deliver the life saving procedures that could have saved the lives of the two young women who died for the want of a D and C after their spontaneous pregnancy terminations. So, Dr. Magee, what if the procedures were labeled as efforts to recover a fetus and apply all possible medical steps to preserve the life of that fetus? If there is no in tact fetus the procedure would continue as would a normal D and C but be recorded as a failed rescue attempt. I realize this fetal rescue is probably not possible now but perhaps this idea could prompt medical wizards like you to come up with something workable so this carnage can be ended.
    Take care my friend and my best to Patricia as always.
    Larry Williams

  2. Mike Magee
    September 23rd, 2024 @ 2:36 pm

    Thanks for this, Larry! And congrats to your daughter and her husband. As you suggest, language does have a role to play in all this. But the truth of the matter is that no two cases are alike; that the potential viability and welfare of two living organisms is always at play; and that ethical boundaries, rules and regulations must adjust to the realities of the stage of pregnancy one is in. As Roe v. Wade determined, there are legitimate roles for mother, fetus/child, doctor, health institution, and regulatory authority. Roe was a compromise, not perfect, but as we are witnessing pretty darn good. It was built around the patient-physician relationship, the trimester system, and a commitment to patient privacy and autonomy over one’s own body. Sadly, things are likely to get worse before they get better. In the end, there will need to be apologies on a grand scale for the harms that have been done.

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons